Interesting Proposal
Grants Would Finance Private Schooling
WASHINGTON — President Bush’s call for a $300 million program called Pell Grants for Kids is the latest effort by his administration to channel tax dollars to low-income parents to help them send their children to private or religious schools.
His proposal, in his State of the Union address Monday night, was denounced by some top Democratic lawmakers and teachers’ union officials as a national “voucher” program that would only drain resources from urban public schools that in many cases are in need of money.
And some critics said that the president’s call for yet another education initiative only underscored the failure of the No Child Left Behind Act, the federal law that Mr. Bush considers a landmark achievement of his first term.
In naming his proposed program after a federal scholarship program for college students, Mr. Bush sided with advocates for school choice who say low-income parents should be able to send their children to private schools.
The new program would be modeled after a much smaller federally financed “scholarship” initiative in Washington that Mr. Bush championed in 2003, which has provided more than $14 million a year for low-income children to attend private and religious schools.
But some lawmakers influential on education issues were not impressed by the proposal.
“The president didn’t commit the resources to expand educational opportunity,” Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, said in a prepared statement.
“Instead, on top of a $70 billion shortfall in funding for his own education reforms, he again proposed to siphon scarce resources from our public schools to create new voucher programs,” said Mr. Kennedy, who is chairman of the health, education and labor committee.
Randi Weingarten, the president of the teachers’ union in New York City, said: “It is an indictment of how No Child Left Behind hasn’t worked. If that policy had worked that would be no reason to call for any new policies to turn around and compete with public schools.”
Hmm...I wrote a paper on this topic just a few months ago and had a very different take on it. Is it possible that I actually agree with Bush? In theory, vouchers give the people (presumably parents) the freedom of choice in the education market. Using economic principles, the equillibrium will occur where supply meets demand. In education terms this means that if parents have the freedom to express their "demands" in schools, the failing schools will close and schools that the parents want their children to attend will be forced to accommodate the demand, whether through opening new schools or expanding existing ones. Like I said before in theory this would work, but it has yet to be implemented on a large scale. Could this be the answer to the U.S. education system´s problems? Possibly, but no one policy change would be strong enough to fix all the problems we are facing.
Now using public money (the vouchers) to pay for private, or even religious schools, opens another whole can of worms, so to speak. Every child has the right to receive an appropriate education, but isn´t that what our public schools should be doing? But on the other hand, I did the research and the data shows overwhelmingly positive effects of private, even more so Catholic schools, for low income minority students. So its a tricky, sticky mess trying to sort this all out. Interesting though...very interesting...

