LISBON, Feb. 9 — Last week, children from two Roman Catholic day-care centers in the port city of Setúbal were sent home with a most unusual note: a fictional letter from a fetus to the woman who conceived and aborted it.
“Mommy, how were you able to kill me?” the letter read. “How were you able to allow me to be cut up in pieces and thrown into a bucket?”
The Rev. Miguel Alves, the day-care center director who sent the letters, defended his action as perfectly normal, adding, “There’s no reason for indignation.”
The letter reflects one view in a passionate, often raw campaign to sway voters before a referendum this Sunday on whether Portugal should decriminalize abortion.
>>Keep Reading<<
Wow. I'm not sure where exactly I stand on the abortion debate, but this seems like a bit of an extreme campaign. Coming from a strong conservative Catholic family, I grew up hearing how abortion is wrong in every circumstance. Only recently have I begun questioning this belief. And while I don't think I would ever be able to go through with an abortion I can definitely see why others would.
In my Ethics and Health Care class this week's topic was abortion which sparked a huge debate over the morality of aborting a fetus. The discussion in our section yesterday basically boiled down to when does a fetus become a person? Is it at the point of conception? The point of viability? Not until birth?
The liberal argument (that a fetus is not a person, only persons have rights and therefore a fetus has no rights, alluding that abortion is right in all instances) is weakened by the fact that there is essentially no difference between a late term fetus and a newborn infant. So by their logic, if a fetus in the 8
th month is not a person, neither is a newborn and infanticide would have to be morally sound. Of course no one believes killing babies is correct, but is it moral to abort a fetus that could survive outside the womb?
On the other hand, the conservatives argue that abortion is always wrong. They counter the liberal argument by saying that while a fetus is not an actual person, it is a
potential person which gives it the right to live. The liberals respond by asserting that the rights of an actual person trump a potential person, therefore the conservatives argument is invalid. Additionally, if you carry out the conservative argument to the extreme, then anything that interferes with the development of potential persons (
ie. contraception, morning after pill, etc) is morally wrong as well. And I definitely don't agree with this.
Therefore, I must be a moderate in this case. In my mind, the morally correct response lies somewhere between abortion always being right and abortion always being wrong. At this point in time I'm leaning towards the point of viability being the determining point when a fetus acquires rights, but this leads to other problems. Such as when is the point of viability? Especially with new developments in technology, this is a fuzzy point in time.
Ok, well this is making my head spin...Too deep of a post for my current state of mind :P